2 Comments

This is a terrific article. I have not been inclined to worry much about "marriage penalties" in tax and transfer programs because as Gene says, doing away with them requires compromising other goals, such as progressivity. It's also very expensive and with limited resources not necessarily the best place to invest or forego revenues. But one reason, I think we need to think harder about all of this in the way he suggests is because cohabitation is becoming far more common. And cohabitation is less stable and enduring than marriage. I'd love to see a study that asked cohabitors how much these tax or transfer rules have affected their decision about when and whether to marry.

Expand full comment

Republican seek/get tax breaks for businesses and wealthy people in exchange for uncoordinated, un-thought-through expansions of tax credits and/or entitlements for lower income persons, often with the result of more economic incentive to have kids while not married, have more kids while single, and not make too much money whether single or married

Expand full comment